Character Reference Letter for a Friend :: Business Character Reference Letters

Character Reference Letter for a Friend The purpose is to provide a character reference for Bob Simmons whom I have known as a classmate, roommate, and friend for a period of six years. I first met Bob our freshman year at State College. We were studying an arts program there and became acquainted through a number of classes that we shared. By the second year, we had become friends and decided to live together in an off-campus apartment. We shared that living arrangement until we graduated last year. Having gotten to know Bob over the past few years, puts me in a position to provide you with a pretty accurate assessment of his character. As a student, Bob was hard-working and highly committed to his education and grades. I believe that his excellent transcripts will attest to that fact. In addition, he was involved in a number of extra-curricular activities including the track and field team and the school newspaper. In his last two years he was Assistant Editor of the "Campus Times". He was always outgoing, willing to help someone out, and was very popular with his fellow students. As a roommate, Bob was a great choice. He was very neat and tidy at all times and he liked things in the apartment to be kept orderly. He made a point of cleaning his own room and the common living areas on a regular basis. He socialized occasionally at home but was always respectful of my needs, and he and his guests kept the noise down and ended their activities at a reasonable hour. As a friend, Bob is as good as they come. He is loyal, honest, respectful, and supportive, and has the ability to see and understand things from another person's perspective, not just his own. He is a great direct communicator and knows how to raise and discuss common living issues and problems in a non-threatening manner. He is hyper-sensitive and is always tuned into how the person might feel in a given situation.

The effect of hyperinflation

The main effect of hyperinflation is that consumers struggle in buying what they need. The prices of goods rise continuously, so people do not have enough money to buy the items they would have been able to afford previously. This results in debt, which would be hard to pay off especially if prices continue to rise, or going without, which could cause health issues. There is also the temptation of theft; in desperation some people might be drawn to thievery to support their family. Even for those few people whose salary kept pace with inflation, it was hard to buy the goods. They needed so much money to buy what they needed that they would physically struggle to transport the money to the shop. In some cases of hyperinflation, people had to transport money in wheelbarrows because they needed so many notes for even small items. An example of this was in Germany 1923, where a single loaf of bread eventually cost 200 billion marks. Another result of prices rising all the time was that workers had to get paid twice a day to rush out and buy their goods before prices rose even more. Furthermore, this meant that wages never caught up with the ever-diminishing value of money, and were insufficient to cover the costs. Another important effect of hyperinflation is that people in general struggled with growing shortages. When small items were equal to thousands, or even millions, of notes, foreign suppliers started refusing to accept the hyper-inflated currency. This meant that imports dried up and shortages of food and other goods got worse, for everyone. In addition, savings, insurance policies and pensions became worthless. This mainly affected the middle class, particularly old age pensioners, and widows. For unemployed people relying on savings and pensions, this was devastating and caused many problems. On the other hand, this worked to the advantage of those in debt before the hyperinflation, who would now easily be able to pay them of as the sums involved became worthless. Businesses were greatly affected by hyperinflation as well, for good and bad. Wealthy businessmen would benefit from hyperinflation because property was cheap and with smaller businesses struggling; the bigger, more successful businesses would take over the smaller ones at low cost. . Unfortunately, it didn’t help smaller businesses as much. They had to pay higher wages which they could not afford and had less buying power. They were also in risk of being bought out by the bigger businesses leaving them unemployed. Leading on from this, the workers would struggle too because when the smaller businesses got taken over, they would lose their jobs and then struggle to pay for goods, whilst unemployed. . On some occasions, one result of hyperinflation was that the government printed more money. This made it better to start with, but ultimately made inflation worse and initiated another cycle. As the prices rose, more money was printed, causing prices to rise again. In conclusion, the main effect of hyperinflation was that people struggled with buying what they needed, however there are many other effects that caused shortages and hardship: savings and debts becoming worthless, bigger businesses taking over the smaller ones, leading to unemployment, and the government printing more money. There are lots of effects of hyperinflation, and although it benefited a few people, on the whole, it caused chaos and misery for the people.

Capital Punishment doesn’t Stop Crime Anywhere - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1419 Downloads: 7 Date added: 2019/03/11 Category Law Essay Level High school Tags: Capital Punishment Essay Did you like this example? Crime is all over the place. Wherever we look, we discover offenders and crime. Criminals are now walking and surround us everyday. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Capital Punishment doesn’t Stop Crime Anywhere" essay for you Create order Does this mean we let them be the dimness of our general public? No, most definitely not. Eliminating crime and criminals is our duty, and we can not ignore it. A few offenders perpetrate a wrongdoing since they have no other choice to endure, however some do it for the sake of entertainment. If you make someone suffer, you deserve to suffer and deserve as much pain as they did. An individual, who stole treat from a market, unquestionably doesnt merit capital punishment. Anyway a sequential executioner, who slaughters individuals for entertainment only or for the individual gain, without a doubt merits capital punishment. The death penalty should not be given just to anyone who commits a murder. One of the witnesses against the execution in â€Å"Recent Work† before the Senate committee last year was Earl Charles, a person who spent over 3 years on a Georgia death house for murders he didnt commit. Another witness remarked that, had Mr.Charles faced a system, wherever the le gal equipment was speedier and therefore the execution had been distributed a lot of with efficiency, we might currently be talking in concern concerning the late adult male.Charles and bemoaning our error. As somebody who LED over several of Texas executions, former American state lawyer General Jim Mattox has remarked, It is my very own expertise that those dead in American state werent deterred by the existence of the execution law. I feel in most cases youll realize that the murder was committed beneath severe drug and substance abuse(â€Å"To end the Death Penalty† 1). theres no conclusive proof that the execution acts as a more robust deterrent than the threat of captivity. A survey of the previous and gift presidents of the countrys high educational sociology societies found that eighty four of those consultants rejected the notion that analysis had incontestable any deterrent effect from the death penalty. Some counterclaims would be it affects crime rate, No system is perfect and it may be expensive but worth it. Capital punishment should be illegal in the united states because we are convicting innocent people, the death penalty is way more expensive and capital punishm ent doesn’t deter crime. Once in prison, those serving life sentences regularly subside into an everyday practice and are to a lesser degree a risk to submit viciousness than different detainees. Additionally, most states at present have a sentence of existence without the chance for further appeal. Detainees who are given this sentence can never be released. Thus, the protection of society is assured while not giving the mistreatment of being executed. The execution is just too pricey and time intense to effectively forestall folks from committing murder. The death penalty in the U.S. is Associate in Nursing staggeringly pricey and wasteful program with no clear advantages. All of the studies on the price of death penalty conclude its far more pricey than a system with life sentences because the most penalty. According to â€Å"The Economic Impact of the Death Penalty†, Nebraska estimated that each death penalty prosecution cost its taxpayers about $1.5 million more than a life without parole (â€Å"Death Penalty† 1). This demonstrates that we’re spending way too much money on ending someone’s life. To keep a person in jail for life it cost about $740,000 and the death penalty in other states cost about $1.2 million. Others believe the death penalty may be expensive but it’s worth it. They believe it’s worth paying with our taxes. The death penalty should also be illegal because we are was ting money on putting them to death. Why should we spend money on them? Rather than keeping them in cells to avoid more danger in our lives. They are using our money that we work hard to make to kill inmates who just deserve to be in jail for life and it cost less money for the government. According to the article â€Å"Death cure† if the death penalty was replaced with sentence of life without parole, it would cost millions of less and ensures the public that they’re protected(â€Å"Deathsecure†1). The money spent on the death penalty could be spent on something more important. We can be using it on programs and improve the communities we live in. The millions of dollars we spent could be spent on roads, education, police officers, safety programs, after school programs and even crime programs for victims and their families. There are those that have a middle ground opinion. They believe that the penalty corporal punishment ought to be reserved for cases wherever the party is clearly guilty of the crime and therefore the crime warrants death as punishment. They suppose solely bound crimes with a concept out decide to kill earlier ought to be execution cases. This is to make sure that solely the worst get chastised this manner. The proponents to death penalty believe it may be expensive but worth it. Carlos Deluna was executed in 1989 for the murder of store clerk Wanda Lopez in 1983. Wanda lopez was stabbed and killed to death, but was the murderer actually Carlos Deluna? No, years later in 2006 he was found innocent and was wrongly executed. This is exactly why we shouldn’t allow the death penalty in the United States. Over 100 and fifty people area unit exonerated(â€Å"Death Penalty information Center,2).Those area unit one hundred fifty those that could’ve been dead for a criminal offense they neer committed. Theres an average of 3 exonerations per year. The people for capital punishment say no system is perfect, that’s all they have to say for an innocent person being wrongly accused. They say it’s someone’s life, so life for life. Many of those cases were discovered not as a result of the traditional appeals method, but rather as a result of new scientific techniques, investigations by journalists, and the dedicated work of skilled atto rneys, not offered to the everyday ward inmate. Capital Punishment doesn’t stop crime anywhere. Nationally, murder rates are significantly lower in states that don’t use the death penalty than in those with a death penalty statute and have been consistently for the past two decades. Even law enforcement agrees the most needed tool for reducing violent crime is resources for law enforcements. Most people on cellblock committed their crimes within the heat of passion, while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or while suffering from mental illness. They represent a bunch thats extremely unlikely to form rational choices supported a worry of future consequences for his or her actions.â€Å"The people for capital punishment say in the 1960’s there was a seven-membered rate crime rate increase†(Death Penalty,1). The idea that the execution has the ability to prevent murder is naive and clearly evidenced false by the facts. Studies that have shown the execution reduces crime are discredited by rigorous a nalysis. The state murder rate has declined within the years since executions stopped. Given this truth, theres no credible argument that the execution deters crime. Conclusion Society takes several risks within which innocent lives is lost. We build bridges, knowing that statistically some employees are going to be killed throughout construction; we have a tendency to take nice precautions to cut back the amount of uncaused fatalities. But wrongful executions are a preventable risk. By substituting a sentence of life while not parole, we meet societys needs of punishment and protection while not running the danger of associate inaccurate and irreversible penalization. Even if the corporal punishment punishes some whereas stinting others, it does not follow that everyone should be spared. The guilty ought to still be chastened suitably, even if some do escape proper punishment unfairly. The corporal punishment ought to apply to killers of black folks also on killers of whites. High paid, skillful lawyers mustnt be ready to get some defendants off on technicalities. The existence of some general issues isnt any reason to abandon the total corporal punishment system. The death penalty needs to be treated fairly and right.â€Å"An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth†. This is differently for somebody to mention theyre confirmatory of the corporal punishment. The death penalty is a revenge. It kills innocent people every year. Many of the families of victims dont wish the criminals to be place to death. The death penalty costs more than a life sentence in prison.